Just In
- 1 hr ago Bank Holidays In April 2024: Banks Will Remain Closed For 14 Days, Check Out The Complete List Here!
- 3 hrs ago Aditi Rao Hydari's Double Diamond Engagement Ring Is Unique, Celebrity Wedding Rings That Are Bookmark Worthy!
- 6 hrs ago Navratri 2024 Date In April: When Will Chaitra Navratri Festival Start? Significance Of 9 Days, Deets Inside!
- 7 hrs ago Ramadan 2024: 6 Bollywood-Inspired Outfit Ideas To Shine During The Holy Month
Don't Miss
- Movies Elvish Yadav Controversy: Astrologer Janardan Dhurve's Prediction About Bigg Boss OTT 2 Winner Turns Out To Be
- Sports Will RCB fans take Rohit Sharma or Hardik Pandya? Answer goes Viral on Social Media
- News Delhi Weather Update: IMD Warns Of Heavy Rain, Hailstorms
- Finance 3 Bonus Issues: Tata Group IT Giant To Recommend Dividend In 14 Days, Buy?
- Automobiles Citroen Basalt Vs Tata Curvv – The Beauty Contest
- Travel Choosing Your Next Home: Hyderabad Or Pune?
- Education National Management College begins admissions for CA and CMA courses
- Technology Samsung Galaxy M15 5G Launch in India Teased; Could Be Priced Under Rs 15,000
The Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Non-Manifested IV
With the spectator and the spectacle it is as with the clay and the multiple objects that may be fashioned out of clay: The clay in itself is never perceived. What one is seeing, a jar for example, is but a form of it. Can one say, nevertheless, that the clay is an entity distinct from the jar? There are no two things: There is not the clay and the jar. The clay actually appears under this particular form, but there has never been and there will never be anything but clay: It is the infinite possibility of form. Therefore, we will never be able to perceive the spectator who is Being itself; we only know its manifestations. At the same time Being can never be absent: Nothing can exist without That, nothing exists but That. What, then, is the value of the spectacle from this point of view? There is only Being, the spectator, and the infinite possibility of spectacles.
In verse 2.16 we find this existential perspective again (cf chapter 6.2). In this context Shankara shows how, in each act of perception, a double consciousness, a double vision occurs: the vision of that which changes (the unreal), and the vision of that which remains (the Real). In fact, in the same act of perception five essential characteristics may be distinguished: asti (Existence), bhati (Luminosity), priya (Love), nama (name), and rupa (form). The latter two attributes which correspond to the manifested, particularize the object and, as a result, permit it to be known as an object. Our experience of space and time is conditioned by the vision which changes, that of nama-rupa.
On the other hand, the intuition of the Real (asti, bhati and priya) is non-dual and transcends the notions of time and space. But the power of Maya is such that man becomes attached to that which perishes. Only the knowledge of the akshara can remove this ignorance. The enquiry (vichara) which gradually eliminates the emotional reaction and the attachment to the perishable form will make the seeker conscious of the sole reality of Atman, the Self.
'There are two sorts of visions', Shankara writes in his commentary on the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (I.4.10), 'the ordinary vision and the real vision. The ordinary vision is a function of the mind, being effected through the organ of sight. It is an action and, therefore, it has a beginning and an end. But Atman is the witness of this ordinary vision, and its vision is like the heat and the light of fire: Being the very essence of the witness, it has neither beginning nor end. Because it appears to be connected with the ordinary vision (which is a product and but a mode of it), the real vision is called "the Witness". In fact, it is itself that which is being differentiated into witness and vision. The vision of Atman is the knowledge of the impersonal, the knowledge of the akshara. This is the highest realisation which man may attain to. He who reaches that state will neverbe deceived any more by the appearances. 'That,' Sri Krishna says, 'is My supreme abode.'
About the author
A
monk
of
the
Ramakrishna
Order,
India,
Swami
Siddheswarananda
(1897-1957)
taught
Vedanta
in
Europe
in
the
1940s
as
the
Minister-in-Charge
of
Centre
Vedantique
Ramakrichna,
Gretz,
France.
This
is
the
fourth
installment
of
a
series
of
about
a
dozen
articles
on
various
themes
of
the
Gita-teachings
based
on
his
notes.
Chat With The Devotees Of Ramakrishna Paramahamsa
- sri ramakrishnaThe Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Seer And The Seen-V
- sri ramakrishnaThe Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Seer And The Seen-IV
- sri ramakrishnaThe Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Seer And The Seen-III
- sri ramakrishnaThe Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Seer And The Seen-II
- sri ramakrishnaThe Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Seer And The Seen
- sri ramakrishnaThe Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Non-Manifested III
- sri ramakrishnaThe Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Non-Manifested II
- sri ramakrishnaThe Eternal Message Of The Gita-The Non-Manifested-I
- yoga spiritualityGita Jayanti 2023: Wishes, Greetings, Texts, Messages, WhatsApp And Facebook Status
- yoga spiritualityDid You Know That One Shloka Which Carries The Essence Of The Bhagavad Gita?
- yoga spiritualityWhat Is The Difference Between Srimad Bhagavatam And Shrimad Bhagavad Gita
- faith mysticismWhy Did Lord Krishna Choose Arjuna Over Others To Teach Bhagavad Gita?