Latest Updates
-
Nana Patekar’s Sudden Cardiac Arrest: Cardiologist Explains What Warning Signs People Often Miss -
Throwback Thursday: Before Uday Shetty, There Was Anna — Nana Patekar’s 7 Most Iconic Screen Characters -
PM Narendra Modi Marks 25 Years In Government With Prayers At Delhi’s Historic Shri Vinayak Temple -
Indian Air Force Day 2026: Inside The 94th Anniversary Celebrations, Theme, History And Air Displays -
Nana Patekar Passes Away At 75: Veteran Bollywood Actor’s Last Public Appearance Video Goes Viral -
Masik Shivratri October 2026: Why This Sacred Night Is Significant For Lord Shiva Devotees -
Guru Pradosh Vrat 2026: Know The Puja Timings, Fasting Rules And Shiva Worship Rituals -
The Screen–Snack Connection: Expert Explains How Screen Time Changes Kids' Eating -
Vijay Deverakonda Says Rashmika Mandanna Tells Him ‘I Love You’ 10-15 Times A Day — A Psychologist Explains -
Culturally Matched NDIS Support in Melbourne: Where to Start
Media Reports Claiming Under-Reporting Of COVID Deaths Ill-Informed, Baseless & Misleading: Govt
The Health Ministry has refuted media reports alleging a "significant undercount" of COVID-19 deaths in the first two waves in India, saying these are fallacious, ill-informed and mischievous in nature.
The Government of India has a very comprehensive definition to classify Covid deaths, based on globally acceptable categorisation, it said.

In a statement, the ministry refuted some media reports alleging a "significant undercount" of the actual number of people who have died in India due to COVID-19 in the first two waves and that the final toll may be "substantially greater" crossing the figures of about three million.
"It is clarified that such media reports are fallacious and ill-informed. They are not based on facts and are mischievous in nature. India has a very robust system of birth and death reporting which is based on a statute and is carried out regularly from the gram panchayat level to the district level and state level," the statement said.
The ministry said the whole exercise is carried out under the overall oversight of the Registrar-General of India (RGI).
"Moreover, the Government of India has a very comprehensive definition to classify Covid deaths, based on globally acceptable categorisation. All deaths are being independently reported by states, and are being compiled centrally. The backlog in COVID-19 mortality data being submitted by the states at different times are being reconciled in the data of Govt of India on a regular basis," it said.
A large number of states have regularly reconciled their death numbers and have reported arrear deaths in a broadly transparent manner. Therefore, to project that deaths have been under-reported is without basis and without justification, it added.
The ministry clarified that there is an "extreme difference" in the Covid caseload and linked mortality between Indian states.
"Any assumptions putting all states in one envelope would mean mapping skewed data of outliers together with states reporting lowest mortality which is bound to stretch the median towards higher and wrong results," the ministry said.
Furthermore, there is an incentive in India to report Covid deaths as they are entitled to monetary compensation. Hence, the likelihood of under-reporting is less, it said.
"During a disruptive situation like the pandemic, the actual mortality could be more than the reported deaths due to many factors, even in the most robust health systems. However, any analysis with the view to deducing information collected from extremely varied caseload and outcome situations among Indian states is bound to be incomplete and incorrect," the statement said.
These current media reports on "significant undercount" of the actual number of people who have died in India are based on a study that seems biased in nature as only adults with COVID-19 symptoms were captured and cannot be thus representative of the general population, the statement said.
"There also appears to be selection bias as the survey is restricted to phone owning people who can also take out time to answer questions comprehensively. The sample could be skewed towards urban areas in that sense, where more cases were reported, and thus, have a higher reporting. They are also people likely to be more aware and have greater reporting bias," it said.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.



Click it and Unblock the Notifications
