Latest Updates
-
Melt-in-Mouth Sweet Mysore Pak Recipe: A Classic Indian Delight -
Between Meetings and Meals: Why American Pecans Are the Ideal Midday Snack -
Skincare Hacks 101: 7 Summer Hacks That Actually Work in 40°C Heat -
8 Workouts That Should Be a Part of Everyone’s Lifestyle for Longevity -
Simple Everyday Dal Recipe: Your Go-To Chana Dal -
Italian PM Giorgia Meloni’s ‘Desi’ Look Wins Internet with Jhumkas -
May 2026 Bank Holidays in India: Check Complete State-Wise List -
What To Watch This Week (April 20–26): New OTT Releases Across Netflix, JioHotstar, Prime Video, ZEE5 And More -
Panchamrit Recipe: A Traditional Temple Delight -
Horoscope for Today April 24, 2026 - Steady Progress & Practical Choices
Thirukkural- On Virtue- Avoidance Of Meat-Eating-Kural-254

To make others break the law of not killing is inconsistent with compassion;There is, therefore, no sense in eating the meat obtained by such killing.
Compassion is non-killing; killing betrays the absence of it (alladhu). Then what is the sense in eating the meat secured by killing? This is the straight meaning of the Kural, according to Manakudavar, which implies the meaning given by me above in the translation.
It constitutes Valluvar's criticism of the casuists, who try to isolate the virtue of non-killing from the dietary habits of meat-eating. Probably the poet, was also having a dig at the religious sects, some of whose members made a fetish of not killing even accidentally, small insects and other creatures, but at the same time did not hesitate to gorge themselves with the flesh of animals killed by others.
Quite surprisingly that prince among commentators, Parimelalagar, has tied himself up into knots, in trying to explain the construction and meaning of this Kural. As Thiru K M Balasubramaniam would say, Manakudavar interprets it appropriately straightway, without departing from the line adopted by Parimelalagar. I agree with Manakudavar's interpretation.



Click it and Unblock the Notifications