Click it and Unblock the Notifications
Latest Updates
-
Bryan Johnson Diagnosed With Autoimmune Gastritis: Low Ferritin Despite Normal Blood Counts? Expert Explains -
Rahul Mishra's 'Devi' Collection Brings Ancient Indian Temple Sculptures To Life At Paris Haute Couture Week -
Honeymoon Suite On Wheels? Couple's Decorated First AC Coupe Goes Viral, TTE Lands In Trouble -
Rajesh Sharma Health Update: Actor Hospitalised After Suspected Insect Bite—When Can A Bug Bite Turn Serious? -
Throwback Thursday: 'Beam Of Light' Shot And Other Interesting Facts On Guru Dutt's 101st Birth Anniversary -
Horoscope for Today July 09, 2026 - Practical Choices & Steady Progress -
Delhi Rohini Building Collapse: What Happened, Casualties, Rescue Operations And All We Know So Far -
Aamir Khan's Rare Ruby Wedding Ring For Gauri Spratt Took 256 Hours And 131 Artisans To Craft -
Anshula Kapoor's Late Mom's Dupatta Steals Show, Take Cues From Kapoor Sisters Wedding And Reception Looks -
This One Furniture Item Is The Secret To Cosier Monsoon Mornings—An Interior Expert Explains
Is Your Price Worth The Quality?
After testing ten pairs of jeans and ten polo t-shirts, the quality of the high street clothes and found that supermarket and so-called value retailers performed better than designer names. The garments were tested in a professional laboratory, used by the fashion industry.
The jeans ranged in price from 7 pounds to 123 pounds, while the polo shirt ranged in price from 12 pounds to 85 pounds. In both cases, the cheap versions of the clothes generally fared better than the expensive versions.
The garments were tested in 15 different trials, which analysed their colour fastness, their seam strength, how much they shrunk after wash and their resistance to abrasion.
It is clear that there is no longer a link between quality and price. It may not have been the cheapest clothes that won, but it definitely was not the high priced branded stuff.
Continue with Google