Rich? Earning Well? From Mumbai To Patna, These Cities Make Buying A House A Multi-Decade Dream!

Add as a preferred source on Google

Let's be honest-how many of us have scrolled through property listings only to close the tab in despair? "Maybe next year," we say. But is it really just about time, or is home ownership slipping further out of reach even for the top earners? A new analysis by National Housing Board (NHB) data and urban income estimates cited by Times of India reveals just how many years the richest 5% in each Indian city would have to save (at India's average gross savings rate) to afford a 110-square-metre house in their capital city. And the results are... telling.

Spoiler: In some cities, even the top 5% might need a century.

Photo Credit: Freepik

Mumbai: The City of Dreams... And 109 Years Of Saving

If you're in Mumbai, brace yourself. Even the top 5% of earners would need a staggering 109 years of consistent saving to buy a modest-sized house. That's more than a lifetime, and more than double the next city on the list. With an average home price of ₹3.54 crore and a savings capacity of ₹3.2 lakh per year, the math is clear and bleak.

It's no wonder Mumbai is fast becoming a city of renters rather than owners. Even the financially privileged are priced out.

Gurugram, Bhubaneswar, And Patna: Still Out Of Reach

Next on the list is Gurugram, where it would take 64 years of saving to afford a ₹2.26 crore house even with an average top 5% income of ₹11.7 lakh per year. Bhubaneswar clocks in at 53 years, and Patna at 45. Despite having lower housing costs compared to metros, the relatively modest incomes and poor savings ratio stretch the timeline far beyond comfort.

If you're dreaming of a house in these cities, you might want to consider multiple income streams or inheritances.

Delhi, Bengaluru And Chennai: Better, But Still Tough

Let's talk about cities where you might actually see the finish line (even if it's still a marathon away). In Delhi, it takes 35 years, in Bengaluru, 36 years, and in Chennai, 37 years of saving. This tier of cities still reflects the urban property crunch, but the gap between income and real estate is at least theoretically bridgeable here-eventually.

Still, for many middle-class families, that "bridge" comes with a lifetime of EMIs, compromises, and delayed dreams.

Jaipur And Chandigarh: The Only Real Glimmers?

Here's where things get interesting. Chandigarh emerges as the most accessible among major cities-only 15 years of saving for a ₹78 lakh home. Jaipur is close behind at 16 years. If home ownership is your dream, these might just be the cities where it's still possible within a generation.

Whether it's lower property prices, better income-to-cost ratios, or both-these cities offer hope.

What's Causing This Gap?

The calculation uses India's gross savings to GDP ratio of 30.2% meaning it assumes people save about 30% of their annual income. But in real life, the cost of living, lifestyle aspirations, inflation, and emergencies all eat into that savings figure. Most urban households don't even come close to saving this much consistently.

And remember: this study looked at the richest 5% in each state. For the average middle-income family, these numbers could easily double.

The Home Truth

So what does this mean for us? In a nutshell it's not just you. Housing affordability in India is deeply skewed, even for the upper crust. For most young professionals or couples dreaming of buying a home, the journey is no longer just about hard work or smart budgeting, it's about rethinking priorities.

Photo Credit: Freepik

Maybe it's renting without guilt. Maybe it's investing elsewhere and retiring in a smaller city. Or maybe it's about demanding policy changes and fairer real estate regulation.

But one thing's for sure, we can't ignore these numbers anymore. Because behind every statistic is a story, and most of them begin with: "We wanted to buy a home..."