Latest Updates
-
Alia Bhatt's Ethnic Outfits Stole Every Spotlight At Best Friend Akansha Ranjan Kapoor's Wedding Celebrations -
Jagannath Rath Yatra 2026: 10 Iconic Odia Delicacies Every Visitor Must Try In Puri -
Katrina Kaif Shares Birthday Dump, Gives Glimpse Of Baby Vihaan: 10 Little Details Worth A Closer Look -
Sita Vs Shurpanakha! Sai Pallavi And Rakul Preet Singh's Sarees Ruled The Ramayana Pratham Sankalp Event -
National Film Awards 2026: From Yami Gautam's Big Win To Dhanush's Double Triumph—7 Biggest Takeaways -
Things To Do In The Rain: 10 Cozy Monsoon Ideas That Will Make You Love Rainy Days Even More -
Sarcoma Awareness Month 2026: Can A Sports Injury Hide Sarcoma? Medical Oncologist Explains The Warning Signs -
Who Is Gitanjali J. Angmo? Why Sonam Wangchuk's Wife's Statement On His Treatment Is Making Headlines -
Jennifer Winget's Viral Bridal Gown Trial Video Reveals The Intricate Details Behind Her Bespoke Couture Look -
Happy Birthday Bhumi Pednekar: How Rishikesh, Pushkar And Meditation Helped The Actress Find Inner Peace
Common Infertility Treatments Of 'Little Use'

They offer a ray of hope for couples trying for a baby, but according to a new research, common infertility treatments do not live up to their promises.
The study from University of Aberdeen has found that two specific interventions for infertile couples may not improve fertility.
For the study, the researchers recruited 580 women who had experienced unexplained infertility for more than two years from four teaching hospitals and a district general hospital in Scotland.
The participants were randomly assigned to three groups, where one group of women were encouraged to try naturally for a pregnancy and had no medical interventions; one took oral clomifene citrate (CC) which is believed to correct subtle ovulatory dysfunction and the other had unstimulated intra-uterine insemination (IUI) of sperm.
About 101 women became pregnant and had a live birth during the course of the study.
The researchers found that women, who had no interventions, had a live birth rate of 17 pct, while those taking oral CC had a birth rate of 14 pct.
The third group having unstimulated IUI had a birth rate of 23 pct.
Moreover, side effects abdominal pain, bloating, hot flushes, nausea and headaches were highest in women taking oral CC, affecting 10pct of women.
"These interventions, which have been in use for many years, are unlikely to be more effective than no treatment," the British Medical Journal quoted the researchers, as saying.
The research team calls for high quality clinical trials to guide policymakers and inform patients about the best treatments and the adverse effects associated with these interventions.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.



Click it and Unblock the Notifications