#BoycottNike Is Trending: Why Nike’s Latest Campaign With NorBlack NorWhite Is Under Fire

Add as a preferred source on Google

When Nike unveiled its first collaboration with a homegrown Indian brand, the spotlight should've been on the bold colours, the tie-dye craftsmanship, and the celebration of local tradition. Instead, a storm of criticism is dominating the conversation and it's got little to do with fashion.

The problem? One social media post. One influencer. And one very sensitive political line.

A Much-Hyped Launch With An Unexpected Twist

Nike's tie-up with NorBlack NorWhite, a Delhi-based design label known for pushing boundaries with Indian textile art, was pitched as a moment of cultural pride. The collection, crafted with designers Mriga Kapadiya and Amrit Kumar, reimagines "bandhani"-a traditional tie-dye style with a modern sporty edge. Nike called it a step towards "inviting women into sport" while honouring Indian heritage.

Given Nike's 12-billion-rupee revenue in India in 2023, the brand clearly saw the timing and relevance of going local. But things derailed quickly once the internet took a closer look at the campaign's faces.

The Post That Transformed The Mood

A promotional image for the collection featured Naley, a US-based Bangladeshi influencer. On the surface, the image showed off the clothing. But online sleuths were quick to uncover Naley's past statements especially her comments challenging India's stance on Jammu & Kashmir.

Photo Credit: https://x.com/prashant10gaur/

That's all it took. Instagram and X were suddenly filled with screenshots, commentary, and questions. Why feature someone who has previously shared views seen as anti-India? Especially in a campaign celebrating Indian culture?

What was meant to be a proud launch turned into a PR mess.

Calls To Boycott And Brand Accountability

The reaction was swift and sharp. Many called for a boycott of Nike products, tagging the brand in protest posts and demanding action. Some questioned whether Nike had done any due diligence at all.

"If they're standing by someone who disrespects India's integrity, I'm not standing by them," one user posted.

Another wrote, "You can't celebrate Indian tradition and platform someone who undermines the very idea of Indian unity."

The frustration wasn't limited to political circles, it resonated with everyday customers who saw the move as careless, if not disrespectful.

Hey jokers at @Nike,
You have chosen an anti-India Bangladeshi bigot as "Indian"?
Have you lost your mind! Good luck for destroying your brand for Indian customers! #BoycottNikeIndiapic.twitter.com/WdFlEyjcXV

— Amit Srivastava🕉️🇮🇳 (@AmiSri) June 15, 2025

A Larger Issue: Cultural Campaigns In A Global Age

Global brands are often quick to embrace local culture, but that embrace comes with responsibility. Consumers today aren't passive; they're alert, opinionated, and connected. They don't just see a product; they look at who's selling it, what they stand for, and what their history says.

In this case, featuring an influencer with a controversial political stance in a campaign tied to India's heritage made people feel unseen or worse, insulted.

So, What Happens Now?

Nike hasn't yet made a public statement. Whether they address the issue or stay silent, the response or lack of one will be watched closely. The backlash has already taken on a life of its own, and is a reminder of how quickly online communities can mobilise.

The campaign was meant to spotlight Indian design and women in sport but the public reaction has revealed how tricky it can be for global companies to deal with culture, politics, and people's sentiments all at once.

Nike set out to celebrate Indian culture with a bold, colourful collection but things took a different turn. For many people, the issue wasn't with the clothes, but with who was chosen to represent them. This clearly shows that when culture and national identity are involved, people tend to pay closer attention.